Posts Tagged ‘travel’

A tale of two nanny states

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

Back after a week in the San Francisco Bay Area with the family, exploring parks and museums, visiting relatives, and generally having a good time.

As a visitor I could only experience the awesome nanny state that is California in very limited doses.  It is unfathomable to me what it must be like to live there, let alone during a monumental economic crisis.

But it hits you as soon as you cross the border: just a mile or two in on I-80, you must stop at an Agricultural Inspection station and declare any organic material brought with you, such as fruits and vegetables or house plants.  Depending on their source, some products are banned entirely from entering California, ostensibly to protect the state’s agriculture from damaging pests, but more likely serving as a form of protectionism for the state’s farmers.  Not that we let it bother us; all we had were some apples we had bought for the trip, and we told the bored-looking inspector “no” when he asked us if we had any fruits or vegetables on board.  Civil disobedience!

Then there was the task of finding a supermarket near our hotel so I could pick up some milk and a few other items.  It should have been easy enough; there’s a Safeway almost literally around the corner from the hotel, but I drove past it twice without seeing it.  Why?  Because there were no visible signs near the road identifying the store.  It had a marquee sign on its façade, but the trees lining the boulevard obscured it.  That led me to notice that there were virtually no freestanding signs anywhere in the surrounding business areas.  Just a coincidence, or the inevitable result of burdensome regulations?  Whatever the case, it made a simple economic transaction more difficult than it should be.

(On the other hand, I have to say that California probably has the best-landscaped freeways in the country.)

These are mere nuisances for visitors, however.  My brother-in-law, who is executive chef at an Italian restaurant in San Mateo (and I can’t recommend the place highly enough–the food there is sublime; try the sanddabs if they’re available!), has to deal with far greater licensing and regulatory headaches.  Some of them his restaurant has been able to avoid because it’s been around for nearly 20 years and is exempt from some regulations, but if he had to start that same restaurant today, the cost of regulatory compliance would be nearly prohibitive.

And then there’s the higher-than-average taxes, the near-strangulation of the auto industry by agencies such as CARB, the implosion of the long-overvalued housing market. . . .

Yet there is a lot I like about California.  The cultural attractions are first-rate, even while recognizing many of them enjoy large tax subsidies (this is true just about everywhere, of course).  We especially enjoyed the Exploratorium, an interactive science museum, and the Asian Art Museum, with its incomparable collections of sculptures, paintings, metalwork and jewelry.

But what stood out most for me was the simple ability to walk into any grocery store (or even convenience stores, at least in Nevada) and pick up a bottle of wine or distilled spirits.  You can’t do this in Colorado.  The independent liquor store lobby has squashed every attempt to allow more options to consumers, because naturally they fear being undercut by the big stores.  Like California’s border inspection stations, this type of protectionism only helps specific classes while hurting everyone else.

So California, at least for now, falls into that “nice place to visit but I wouldn’t want to live there” category.  It was good, relatively speaking, to return home and deal with the familiar nuisances of Colorado’s nanny-state laws rather than the unfamiliar rat’s nest of the Golden State.

(The Daily Cuts will return tonight!)

"ID? Sorry, I must have left it with my box cutters."

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008

138. The TSA will no longer allow air travelers to fly unless they produce ID . . . or claim they’ve lost or forgotten it.  The world is now that much safer against terrorists who can’t lie.

139. A high school principal who wrote a letter in support of Derrick Foster, who is charged with shooting two Columbus, Ohio, police officers (see # 134) has apologized publicly: “In no way do I support, in no way do I condone, the alleged actions of my friend.”

140. Denver city attorneys argue that a police officer who beat and stomped on a 16-year-old boy, leaving him with broken ribs and internal injuries, acted in self-defense and used “reasonable force.” Because, you know, having a beer while underage is totally grounds for getting pounded until a kidney bursts.  The cop has been suspended without pay pending felony assault charges.

141. Police in Detroit hit an art gallery, don’t find any drugs, weapons or fugitives, decide to ticket the gallery for holding a dance without a permit.  Gallery director Aaron Timlin: “We’re going to dance without a permit.  If we get a ticket, we’ll fight the ticket and change the law. People should be able to dance where they want.”

142. California seizin’: voters approved Proposition 99, which protects owner-occupied homes from eminent domain seizures (at least in some cases), but leave other types of property such as apartment buildings vulnerable to land grabs by local authorities for private redevelopment.  A competing measure that would have placed much broader restrictions on property seizures by the government was defeated, probably because it would have also done away with rent controls.