This blog is not backed by the United States government.

April 7, 2009 – 1:47 am

158. A pistol-packin’ granny caps a would-be mugger in Manhattan and gets sued for her trouble.

159. Puppycide in Buffalo during a police raid that fails to turn up any drugs or make any arrests.

160. Maricopa County (Ariz.) Sheriff Joe Arpaio, no friend of fugitives, illegal immigrants or civil rights, spends an unknown amount of taxpayers’ money on production costs for a Fox reality show.  Then his boys arrest some people applauding a speech critical of Arpaio during a county supervisors meeting.  And Phoenix police raid the home of a blogger who’s been criticizing them.

161. I’m from the government, and I’m here to check out that funny noise under the hood: President Obama can’t save the banks or balance the budget, but he’s now backing your transmission.  More details about the warranty from those helpful folks at reason:

162. “One of liberty’s great benefactors”, Burt Blumert, chairman of the Mises Institute and a champion of many libertarian causes, passes away at the age of 80.

163. After a student is kicked in the groin, a Connecticut school bans all physical contact.  Because today’s hug could be tomorrow’s headlock.

164. Michigan woman charged for her son’s stay in juvie hall, then is sent to jail herself after she’s unable to pay.

165. More than half of California’s service stations face hefty fines or even closure for failing to install expensive vapor recovery nozzles on their pumps.  The CARB-mandated systems run about $11,000 per pump.

166. Congress seeks to give the FDA the power to regulate tobacco, while also limiting safer choices for people looking to cut back or quit.

167. Speaking of tobacco, remember Obama’s promise not to raise taxes on people making less than $250,000?  Well, he lied, unless you think only rich people smoke.  They don’t, at least not as much as the poor do, making the new cigarette tax increase highly regressive.

A tale of two nanny states

April 2, 2009 – 11:01 am

Back after a week in the San Francisco Bay Area with the family, exploring parks and museums, visiting relatives, and generally having a good time.

As a visitor I could only experience the awesome nanny state that is California in very limited doses.  It is unfathomable to me what it must be like to live there, let alone during a monumental economic crisis.

But it hits you as soon as you cross the border: just a mile or two in on I-80, you must stop at an Agricultural Inspection station and declare any organic material brought with you, such as fruits and vegetables or house plants.  Depending on their source, some products are banned entirely from entering California, ostensibly to protect the state’s agriculture from damaging pests, but more likely serving as a form of protectionism for the state’s farmers.  Not that we let it bother us; all we had were some apples we had bought for the trip, and we told the bored-looking inspector “no” when he asked us if we had any fruits or vegetables on board.  Civil disobedience!

Then there was the task of finding a supermarket near our hotel so I could pick up some milk and a few other items.  It should have been easy enough; there’s a Safeway almost literally around the corner from the hotel, but I drove past it twice without seeing it.  Why?  Because there were no visible signs near the road identifying the store.  It had a marquee sign on its façade, but the trees lining the boulevard obscured it.  That led me to notice that there were virtually no freestanding signs anywhere in the surrounding business areas.  Just a coincidence, or the inevitable result of burdensome regulations?  Whatever the case, it made a simple economic transaction more difficult than it should be.

(On the other hand, I have to say that California probably has the best-landscaped freeways in the country.)

These are mere nuisances for visitors, however.  My brother-in-law, who is executive chef at an Italian restaurant in San Mateo (and I can’t recommend the place highly enough–the food there is sublime; try the sanddabs if they’re available!), has to deal with far greater licensing and regulatory headaches.  Some of them his restaurant has been able to avoid because it’s been around for nearly 20 years and is exempt from some regulations, but if he had to start that same restaurant today, the cost of regulatory compliance would be nearly prohibitive.

And then there’s the higher-than-average taxes, the near-strangulation of the auto industry by agencies such as CARB, the implosion of the long-overvalued housing market. . . .

Yet there is a lot I like about California.  The cultural attractions are first-rate, even while recognizing many of them enjoy large tax subsidies (this is true just about everywhere, of course).  We especially enjoyed the Exploratorium, an interactive science museum, and the Asian Art Museum, with its incomparable collections of sculptures, paintings, metalwork and jewelry.

But what stood out most for me was the simple ability to walk into any grocery store (or even convenience stores, at least in Nevada) and pick up a bottle of wine or distilled spirits.  You can’t do this in Colorado.  The independent liquor store lobby has squashed every attempt to allow more options to consumers, because naturally they fear being undercut by the big stores.  Like California’s border inspection stations, this type of protectionism only helps specific classes while hurting everyone else.

So California, at least for now, falls into that “nice place to visit but I wouldn’t want to live there” category.  It was good, relatively speaking, to return home and deal with the familiar nuisances of Colorado’s nanny-state laws rather than the unfamiliar rat’s nest of the Golden State.

(The Daily Cuts will return tonight!)

Just when you thought it was safe to read again

March 20, 2009 – 11:13 pm

I’m taking a break–planned this time!  I will be on holiday with the family in California.  We leave early tomorrow and will return the following Saturday.  The chances are excellent you won’t see any updates during the next week.

After a near-eight-month hiatus, I don’t think an extra week will make much of a difference.  See you next weekend!

“Popcorn said f*** you”

March 20, 2009 – 12:33 am

A little triage: New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson signed a bill to repeal the state’s death penalty.  And California Representative Maxine Waters has introduced a bill to end mandatory minimum sentencing for Federal drug offenses.

The Daily Cuts:

152. Eminent domain abuse continues four years after Kelo, but some folks are fighting back.  More here from reason’s coverage of eminent domain issues.

153. It’s just no fun being a teenager in Texas.

154. New York state bureaucrats treat “direct-to-consumer” genomics firms as laboratories, burdening them with needless regulations.

155. Marvin “Popcorn” Sutton is my new folk hero.  He decided to check out of this world on his own, rather than have the Feds put him in prison for the unpardonable crime of distilling his own moonshine.  His tombstone reads “POPCORN SAID FUCK YOU”.  Here’s to you, Popcorn.

156. Warren Meyer over at Coyote Blog presents this easy-to-follow checklist on how to start a business . . . in Alabama.  The other 49 states may be different.

157. Congress shovels $182.5 billion dollars into the AIG furnace, then heroically recovers 0.09% of it for taxpayers.

Clunkers, cops and cluelessness.

March 19, 2009 – 12:49 am

Attorney General Eric Holder has clarified the new administration’s medical marijuana policy (see #145) by stating that the DEA will only go after pot dealers who violate both state and Federal law; i.e., anyone not sanctioned by a state where medical marijuana is legal.  So dispensaries in California and patients in Colorado with cultivation licenses should be safe from the Feds, but not illicit dealers.  It’s still not clear what this means for cases already pending in Federal courts, so it may not save Charlie Lynch, who was a licensed medical marijuana dealer in California but was tried and convicted on Federal charges, from a lengthy prison term.  And it does nothing to address the fundamentally broken drug policies at the Federal level.

On to the Daily Cuts:

148. After a six-year battle with the Feds over obscenity charges, two porn film entrepreneurs plead guilty to reduced charges, earning them up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, a far cry from the five decades they faced on the original indictment.  As Jacob Sullum points out, the prosecutor, U. S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan, “seems to be a sincere moral crusader and therefore a public menace”.

149. Even though members of their own party seem lukewarm on the idea, it appears that the Obama administration still doesn’t have enough on its plate, and wants to add a revival of the Federal assault weapons ban.  This time it’s not for the children, but for the poor Mexicans caught in the crossfire of a vicious drug war.  Of course, if we Americans would just stop being such loser dope fiends, we wouldn’t need a drug war in the first place.

150. A Congresswoman from Ohio introduces a real clunker of a bill: $5,000 for any car you can drag to a dealership, to be applied towards the purchase of a new car.  Of course the automakers are supportive of this boondoggle.

151. Comic relief: What, would you rather have the cops kicking in your door?

Abuse, harassment, and customer service (but I repeat myself)

March 17, 2009 – 8:50 pm

143. Homer, Louisiana police chief Russell Mills, after one of his officers shot and killed a 73-year-old mute black man:

“If I see three or four young black men walking down the street, I have to stop them and check their names,” said Mills, who is white. “I want them to be afraid every time they see the police that they might get arrested.

We’re not out there trying to abuse and harass people — we’re trying to protect the law-abiding citizens locked behind their doors in fear.”

Oh, but abusing and harassing black people—that’s just good police work.  I guess we should at least thank Mills for the tacit admission that cops engage in racial profiling.

144. Another drug raid gone wrong, this time resulting in an unarmed Michigan college student getting shot by a cop.  For what?  The police are tight-lipped so far.  But apparently the victim’s Facebook page is filled with drug references, so he must have been a dope-dealing punk, right?

145. President Barack Obama didn’t immediately make good on his campaign promise to end DEA raids on medical marijuana facilities, but eventually Attorney General Eric Holder directed Justice to call off the dogs.  At one point the U. S. Attorney for Los Angeles got the memo—then he didn’t.

146. Jacob Sullum on John Yoo’s disturbing post-9/11 Justice Department memos, which laid out justifications for wholesale curtailments of civil liberties, including suppression of the press:

Yet civil liberties do not mean much if they are abandoned whenever the government thinks it has a good reason to violate them. It is precisely in times of crisis, when politicians are most tempted to take legal shortcuts and the public is most inclined to go along, that constitutional protections are most needed. Although Attorney General Eric Holder claims to understand this, his embrace of Yoo-like rhetoric and reasoning suggests his differences with the former Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) lawyer may be a matter more of circumstance than of principle.

Read the whole thing here.

147. Comic relief: “Take a number, wait your fucking turn” (uh, NSFW).

"too much trouble"

August 1, 2008 – 9:57 pm

I spent some more time today reading through the grand jury report on Danieal Kelly’s murder, alternating between sorrow for this doomed youngster and seething anger at those who failed her.

It starts with her parents, of course.  Neither wanted her; Danieal’s mother, Andrea Kelly, seemed embarrassed to even have her around.  She never took care of her disabled daughter’s basic needs: almost never clothed her or combed her hair, or took her outside for fresh air, or enrolled her in school or made doctor’s appointments.  Andrea hated changing Danieal’s diaper, so she gave her as little food and liquid as possible.  Eventually Andrea stopped caring altogether, and left Danieal to literally rot and starve to death in a filthy, feces-covered bed inside her stifling Philadelphia apartment.

It’s not that Andrea Kelly couldn’t take care of her daughter.  She had at least seven or eight other children living with her, and while she provided lax supervision and a filthy, roach-infested apartment, the other kids were not starving.  And she showed enough initiative each month to cash Danieal’s disability check.  But Danieal was simply too much trouble.

Danieal’s father was hardly better.  He isn’t facing murder charges only because he wasn’t around to witness his daughter’s final, agonizing days.  At first Daniel Kelly did try to take care of Danieal, but his commitment didn’t last long.  He took her and his son to Arizona, where he lived with his girlfriend, about the only person close to Danieal who seemed to care about her.  Kathleen John made sure Danieal was clean and well-groomed, and took her to school, where the teachers were charmed by the girl’s spirit and beautiful singing voice.  Despite cerebral palsy that kept her confined to a wheelchair, Danieal thrived in school.

It didn’t last long.  Daniel Kelly split up with his girlfriend, and Danieal stopped going to school.  Her father eventually returned to Philadelphia and invited Andrea’s mother, and eventually Andrea herself, to move in to help care for Danieal.  This despite the fact that Daniel knew that Andrea had a long history of neglecting her children.  Soon he was gone too, never to look back.  Danieal was simply too much trouble.

But Danieal’s parents weren’t the only ones who couldn’t be bothered to help her.

The city’s Department of Human Services received multiple reports of neglect at the Kelly home.  Nearly all of these complaints were assigned to Dana Poindexter, a 16-year employee of DHS who incredibly was still employed there as of this week, when the grand jury’s report was unveiled.  Poindexter was an “intake” social worker, whose job was to investigate complaints and determine if services were needed to assist the family.

But Poindexter did virtually nothing.  He received reports on Danieal’s neglect as early as 2002 and he never once followed up on them.  And he never made recommendations for services, or closed the complaints as “unsubstantiated”, within 60 days as required by DHS policy.  Thus new reports kept coming in, which he also ignored.  Even when other intake workers received complaints about the Kelly home, they were reassigned to Poindexter because he never closed the earlier reports.

Poindexter sat at his desk, eating lunch and tossing the fast-food wrappers into a bin with other trash, where buried at the bottom lay Danieal’s case file.  He continued to ignore the girl’s plight and even lied about his work on the case to other DHS employees.  He couldn’t be bothered to do his job.  Danieal was simply too much trouble.

Even when DHS finally managed to open a case for Danieal and order services for her, the agency they hired, MultiEthnic Behavioral Health, not only did not deliver services, it defrauded the city (and the taxpayers) by lying about it.  Most of MultiEthnic’s work was performed by an intern, who was not familiar with the case history and in six months of work, only managed to set up a single doctor’s appointment for Danieal, which her mother did not keep.

After the intern left MultiEthnic, the case was turned over to Julius Murray, who made only a few visits to the Kelly home between April and August 2006, when Danieal died.  Absolutely no other action on Murray’s part can be substantiated; it’s not even apparent he ever entered the home.  In fact, MultiEthnic hurriedly fabricated most of its progress reports on Danieal’s case on the day of her death.  Yet it had billed DHS for 10 months of services, none of which was ever provided.  Danieal was simply too much trouble.

How could this happen?

Danieal Kelly might still be alive today had one person who was aware of her condition given a damn, or had listened to someone who did.  And her relatives did try to help.  They urged Andrea Kelly to get help for her daughter, but she pushed them away.  They called DHS, but their complaints disappeared into the black hole centered in Dana Poindexter’s cubicle.  MultiEthnic’s intern paid visits to the home and tried to help, but his inexperience and unfamiliarity with the case doomed his efforts.

At every level—from her parents to the government to the private agency hired to help her—Danieal was ignored, left to starve to death, literally rotting in her bodily fluids.  They all share responsibility for her murder.  Yet the more important lessons will, I fear, be lost as long as people continue to believe the state exists to serve them.

Well, it doesn’t.  The state exists only as a self-perpetuating entity.  It cannot simultaneously serve its own interest and those of the people, because they are mutually exclusive.  And we find ourselves at the state’s mercy because we have surrendered to it the responsibility for protecting our rights, our safety, our “general welfare”.  Yet it is precisely when people are at their most vulnerable—the Danieal Kellys, the refugees from Katrina, the children in crime-ridden housing projects and crumbling public schools—that the state demonstrates its most heartless indifference.

Hardly anyone seemed to care about Danieal Kelly when she was alive, least of all the state.  And it won’t care about the next Danieal Kelly.  But we can.  We must.

the short, sad life of Danieal Kelly

July 31, 2008 – 9:49 pm

The state, to serve and protect our children:

Two Philadelphia social workers were among nine charged yesterday in the death of a Danieal Kelly, a 14-year-old girl who starved to death in 2006, her body eaten by bed sores to the bone.

Unveiling a blistering grand jury report today [PDF], District Attorney Lynne Abraham blasted the city’s Department of Human Services as an indifferent and callous agency that had let Kelly die needlessly.

Drawing gasps at a news conference in which she showed a photograph of Kelly’s bloody, emaciated corpse, Abraham urged the state to take over DHS - a call that was not embraced by state officials.

The grand jury report contains just one photo of Danieal after her death (be forewarned: it’s horrifically graphic), but even it cannot convey the full horror of what this young girl must have suffered, not only at the hands of her mother, but through the wanton neglect of Philadelphia’s DHS and the private agency it contracted to provide services she never received.

This may be the worst example I’ve seen of the state’s failure to perform even the minimal duties expected of it: to guard the safety of its citizens.  If it fails—fundamentally fails, at every level of responsibility—in even this basic endeavor, how can anyone argue it is competent to manage our health, our children’s education, or the economy?  And keep in mind, this isn’t an issue of strained resources or overwhelmed caseworkers—the DHS in Philadelphia is well-funded and staffed, and doesn’t even provide services directly to clients.  It simply decides if action is warranted and then refers cases to private agencies to provide the actual services.  Yet it failed even at what amounted to button-pushing.

It’s true that in Danieal’s case, a private agency demonstrated callous indifference towards her plight, even as it was busy forging paperwork and bilking taxpayers for nonexistent services rendered.  But it could get away with it because its customer, the Philadelphia DHS, was complicit in its crimes.  One administrator even admitted to the grand jury that falsifying and backdating reports was common practice at the agency.

This isn’t an isolated incident.  You can’t find no less than nine adults, four of them social workers, responsible for a person’s death and assume this was a tragic exception to the rule.  As the grand jury wrote in its report:

The fate of a sweet and promising child depended on the willingness of a number of particular adults to do the bare minimum of what they were supposed to do. Danieal’s mother, her father, DHS employees, the agency that contracted with DHS to provide services for Danieal and her family – these make up a rather large cast of characters. Yet, had just one of them performed their duty or done their job, Danieal would be alive today. The combined criminal negligence that transformed the little girl in the school portrait into the shriveled corpse in the autopsy photographs was so callous, so cruel, and so relentless, it constitutes nothing less than homicide.

Indeed.  If I could, I’d charge every one of these people, with the possible exception of Andrea Kelly’s friends, with murder.  And even her friends are morally if not legally culpable when they knew how badly Danieal was suffering and didn’t say a word about it to anyone.

Not that it would have made any difference, given how the city handled the case.  The maggot-infested bedsores covering Danieal Kelly’s body aren’t the only things that have rotted to the bone.

A Heller of a notion.

June 27, 2008 – 9:09 pm

I’ve read speculation in more than a few places around the blogosphere that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Heller, which struck down the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns, should lead to lower murder rates in the nation’s capital (and elsewhere, assuming similar bans can be successfully challenged).

Allow me to toss a glass of cold water on these hopeful musings.

It’s true that D. C.’s gun ban did nothing to reduce its murder rate.  Chicago, which banned handguns in 1982, continued to see its murder rate rise, reaching a peak of 33.9 per 100,000 in 1992 before dropping (and it has dropped dramatically, to as low as 15.6 per 100,000 in 2004).  But it’s still nearly three times the national average.  And the large drop in the murder rate has been attributed more to intensive policing tactics in high-crime areas than to the gun ban.

Conversely, it’s inconclusive that lifting restrictions on guns acts as a deterrent to violent crime, at least in urban areas.  Texas has perhaps the most relaxed gun laws in the nation, but its largest city, Houston, saw a dramatic spike in its murder rate following an influx of refugees from New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina (but it has started to decline this year).  Michigan liberalized its permit requirements in 2002, but Detroit ranks first in the country in homicides, at more than 47 per 100,000.  Whether in the hands of law-abiding citizens or criminals, it isn’t the presence of guns that drive violent crime.  It just happens to be the tool of choice for those who perpetrate crimes, and where legal, those who wish to defend themselves.

Dreaming about a substantial drop in D. C.’s murder rate as a result of Heller, then, ignores all the other factors that can contribute to crime: high population densities, low incomes, crumbling public infrastructure, poor educational systems, family deterioration, drug addiction, etc.  Solving these problems requires a far more nuanced policy approach than simply banning guns or allowing them anywhere.  And the statistics do make clear that of all the tools state and local governments have to fight crime, restrictive gun laws are among the least effective.

Other approaches, such as the “broken windows” tactics used by police in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and Denver, have had a lowering effect on those cities’ violent crime rate, though not always on murder itself.  But that, too, comes at a cost of civil rights violations and even more disturbing, the rapid militarization of local police departments.  Former NYC mayor and Presidential also-ran Rudy Giuliani often touts his “get tough” attitude on crime, ignoring the fact that arrests for petty drug offenses skyrocketed during his tenure, and disproportionately targeted minorities, among other abuses perpetrated by city police.

What, then, can we really expect as the fallout from Heller?  Probably not a magical drop in crime in the country’s inner cities, and certainly not over the short term.  There are still many policy issues regarding gun regulation to sort out, and it will probably take many more years of litigation to resolve them.  None of the solutions to fighting violent crime will come easily.  But the simplest policy, the one that politicians grasp for when they need a populist feather for their cap—abrogating an individual’s right to self-defense which has existed long before the Second Amendment was enshrined in the Constitution—is the worst solution of all.

Dirty informants . . . dirty cops?

June 18, 2008 – 10:15 pm

Radley Balko has an important update on the Ryan Frederick case (# 136).

He cites an unnamed source who claims that a second informant was involved in the break-in of Frederick’s home that ultimately led to the deadly no-knock raid:

Last week I received a tip that there may have been a second man involved in the break-in at Ryan Frederick’s house. My source has spoken to the man a few times over the last few months, and says the man has confirmed not only that he and Steven [the initial informant in the case] together broke into Frederick’s house at the behest of the police, but that the two had been working as paid police informants for months—and had actually broken into several houses around Chesapeake, all with the blessing of Chesapeake police officers. [emphasis mine]

Balko later interviewed this alleged second informant (whom he identified as “Reggie”), who revealed that Steven had struck a deal with the police to get evidence on an alleged pot-growing operation in Frederick’s garage, in exchange for “help” on credit card fraud and grand larceny charges he was facing. Reggie and Steven then broke into Frederick’s garage, although Reggie refused to confirm that they had pulled the burglary with the cops’ knowledge, apparently fearing retaliation.

A few days later, Chesapeake cops hit Frederick’s house on a no-knock warrant. Frederick fired through his front door, killing detective Jarrod Shivers. He now faces capital murder charges in Shivers’ death, as well as a felony charge of manufacturing marijuana, even though police found only a small amount of pot in the home.

Like most police informants, Reggie is no angel; he has served time for burglary and grand larceny. But he says he was slapped with a bogus burglary charge in February to keep him quiet about his involvement in the Frederick case, a claim Balko says has support in the public record:

A search of the Chesapeake General Court’s public records presents a time-line that supports Reggie’s story. He was arrested on February 12 on charges of burglary, grand larceny, and credit card larceny. He spoke to my source a few times over the next several weeks. On June 5, the police then added another grand larceny charge, and a charge of entering a house to commit assault and battery. At that point, Reggie stopped talking to my source.

Steven is also still facing credit card fraud charges, which were reinstated after having been dropped in April. He isn’t talking to anybody right now, and in fact is currently on the run from the police, according to WTKR-TV.

Just these allegations alone, if they can be proven beyond Reggie’s word, reveal an alarming pattern of misconduct by the Chesapeake police. Enticing someone to break into other people’s homes is a criminal act, even when the police do it. Even if they had gathered legitimate evidence of drug manufacturing or trafficking, none of it would be usable in court or even to secure a search warrant. This should throw every drug raid the cops have pulled recently into question, assuming the accused experienced a break-in of their home prior to the raid.

But that’s not the end of it.

The police have claimed since the January raid that officers never fired a shot at Frederick. But WTKR reports that six detectives tested positive for “primer residue”, a substance sometimes left on hands after firing a gun or handling a gun that has been fired. And Frederick’s family claims they have evidence of a bullet hole in his home, even though the police allegedly returned after the raid to fill it in.

But here’s the most interesting part:

A second lab report shows Frederick’s Bersa Firestorm .380 pistol is the gun that fired the fatal bullet, as well as a second bullet found by police. There is no indication in the court file where police found the second bullet. The state crime lab also did some testing on a .223 Remington cartridge found in Frederick’s home. However, the lab did not do DNA testing on the cartridge nor is there any indication what kind of weapon fired the round, according to the paperwork. Police search warrants do not show officers located any weapon in Frederick’s home capable of firing a .223 round.

Chesapeake police spokeswoman Christina Golden confirmed some officers are issued Bushmaster M4 Patrol Rifles, which shoot .223-caliber ammunition.

So why, if Frederick owned a pistol that uses .380 ACP ammunition, would a .223 cartridge be laying around his home?  M4 rifles can accept either Remington .223 or 5.56×45mm NATO cartridges.

It seems every new report on this case unearths more questions the police refuse to answer. Meanwhile, Ryan Frederick faces a long stint in jail while his case inches closer to trial, and the drug raids in Chesapeake continue.